[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1437722723.3834.3.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:25:23 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
Cc: michal.simek@...inx.com, soren.brinkmann@...inx.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] docs: dts: Added documentation for Xilinx Zynq PL
Reset bindings.
Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2015, 15:51 -0700 schrieb Moritz Fischer:
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ac4499e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +Xilinx Zynq PL Reset Manager
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl"
> +- syscon <&slcr>;
> +- #reset-cells: 1
> +
> +Example:
> + rstc: rstc@240 {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl";
> + syscon = <&slcr>;
> + };
Instead of the syscon property, why not specify that the rstc node must
be a child of the slcr node?
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists