[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150724084808.GA8349@amd>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:48:08 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, rpurdie@...ys.net,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: LEDs - skip unnamed LEDs
On Fri 2015-07-24 10:22:04, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 07/23/2015 12:02 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >Devices may declare more LEDs than what is known to input-leds
> >(HID does this for some devices). Instead of showing ugly warnings
> >on connect and, even worse, oopsing on disconnect, let's simply
> >ignore LEDs that are not known to us.
> >
> >Reported-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>
> No more warnings and oopses, so:
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>
> FTR, it now looks like this:
> gusiac:/sys/bus/hid/devices/0003:046D:C50E.0004/input/input15 # ls -1 | grep
> input15
> input15::charging
> input15::mail
> input15::misc
>
> All three have max_brightness of 1, but echo 1 > brightness does nothing.
> Clearly the leds are indeed autonomous only and the mouse shouldn't even
> report them.
Should the mouse get blacklist entry with fixed HID descriptor?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists