lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:27:20 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Andrey Danin <danindrey@...l.ru>
Cc:	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ac100@...ts.launchpad.net, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Julian Andres Klode <jak@...-linux.org>,
	Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: tegra: implement slave mode

Hi Andrey,

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:35:43PM +0300, Andrey Danin wrote:
> Initialization code is based on NVEC driver.
> 
> There is a HW bug in AP20 that was also mentioned in kernel sources
> for Toshiba AC100.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Danin <danindrey@...l.ru>

Still doesn't work for me and I think I understand why. Do you run your
I2C controller in slave mode only? That might work, but using it in
master/slave mode simultanously won't work yet as I see it:

* After every transfer (as master), clocks get disabled. I assume the IP
  core won't be able to detect its own address then.

* There is this code in tegra_i2c_init():

	if (!i2c_dev->is_dvc) {
		u32 sl_cfg = i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_SL_CNFG);
		sl_cfg |= I2C_SL_CNFG_NACK | I2C_SL_CNFG_NEWSL;
		i2c_writel(i2c_dev, sl_cfg, I2C_SL_CNFG);
		i2c_writel(i2c_dev, 0xfc, I2C_SL_ADDR1);
		i2c_writel(i2c_dev, 0x00, I2C_SL_ADDR2);

	}

  It probably messes up the slave initialization in tegra_reg_slave().
  At least I see that the slave address gets overwritten when I peek
  the register after boot.

Does that make sense to you?

Thanks,

   Wolfram

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ