[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150724090342.6d11e16d@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:03:42 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with the NMI mess
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:43:04 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > I'm not too familiar with how to use hw breakpoints, but I'm guessing
> > (correct me if I'm wrong) that breakpoints on code that trigger when
> > executed, but watchpoints on data trigger when accessed. Then
> > copy_from_user_inatomic() would only trigger on watchpoints (it's not
> > executing that code, at least I hope it isn't!), and those wont bother
> > us.
>
> These things can be: RW, W, X.
>
> Sure, hitting a user X watchpoint is going to be 'interesting', but its
> fairly easy to hit a RW one.
But do we care if we do hit one? The return from the #DB handler can
use a RET. Right?
-- Steve
>
> Just watch an on-stack variable and get perf to copy a huge chunk of
> stack (like it does for the dwarf stuff).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists