[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150724150301.GJ19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:03:01 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] perf: x86: Improve accuracy of perf/sched clock
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:39:55PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> @@ -251,17 +253,17 @@ static void set_cyc2ns_scale(unsigned long cpu_khz, int cpu)
> rdtscll(tsc_now);
> ns_now = cycles_2_ns(tsc_now);
>
> - /*
> - * Compute a new multiplier as per the above comment and ensure our
> - * time function is continuous; see the comment near struct
> - * cyc2ns_data.
> - */
I'd leave this comment, but update the one this refers to; esp. the bit
that explains why 10.
Also, I think you can remove the definition of CYC2NS_SCALE_FACTOR.
Other than that, seems like a good idea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists