[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1437750459.2993.224.camel@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:07:39 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Lu Yangbo-B47093 <yangbo.lu@...escale.com>
CC: "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/dts: Add and fix 1588 timer node for eTSEC
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 01:33 -0500, Lu Yangbo-B47093 wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 21:37 -0500, Lu Yangbo-B47093 wrote:
> > > Any comments?
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > Sorry, I must have missed this on my last time through the patch queue.
> > I see you've decimalized the fiper and max-adj properties, which is
> > good... but does it really make sense for tmr-add? I'm not familiar with
> > what this value represents, but the numbers look more natural as hex (e.g.
> > 0xaaaaaaab versus 2863311531).
>
> Yes, the fiper value would be writed into fiper registers. And max-adj
> value would be used in ptp driver in driver/ptp/.
> But you insisted that values should be in decimalism in the v1 patch... :)
>
> See the history :)
I didn't insist on decimals for *everything*, just where it makes sense, and
that "it goes in a register" doesn't *automatically* mean that it doesn't
make sense.
################# history ##################
> > > + ptp_clock@...00{
> > > + compatible = "fsl,etsec-ptp";
> > > + reg = <0xb0e00 0xb0>;
> > > + interrupts = <68 2 0 0 69 2 0 0>;
> > > + fsl,tclk-period = <5>;
> > > + fsl,tmr-prsc = <2>;
> > > + fsl,tmr-add = <0xcccccccd>;
> > > + fsl,tmr-fiper1 = <0x3b9ac9fb>;
> > > + fsl,tmr-fiper2 = <0x00018696>;
> > > + fsl,max-adj = <249999999>;
> >
> > Please don't use hex for numbers that make more sense as decimal.
> > [Lu Yangbo-B47093] The hex value is register value, I think it's better
> > to use hex.
>
> Whether it goes into a register doesn't matter. Hex values are useful for
> values which are subdivided into various bitfields, or whose hex
> representation is simpler than decimal. I'm not familiar with the details
> of this hardware, but I doubt the former is the case for 0x3b9ac9fb ==
> 9999999995 or 0x18696 == 99990.
>
> -Scott
> ######################################
>
>
> >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb-pc.dtsi
> > > > b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb-pc.dtsi
> > > > index c21d1c7..363172d 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb-pc.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb-pc.dtsi
> > > > @@ -215,12 +215,12 @@
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > ptp_clock@...00{
> > > > - fsl,tclk-period = <5>;
> > > > - fsl,tmr-prsc = <200>;
> > > > - fsl,tmr-add = <0xCCCCCCCD>;
> > > > - fsl,tmr-fiper1 = <0x3B9AC9FB>;
> > > > - fsl,tmr-fiper2 = <0x0001869B>;
> > > > - fsl,max-adj = <249999999>;
> > > > + fsl,tclk-period = <5>;
> > > > + fsl,tmr-prsc = <2>;
> > > > + fsl,tmr-add = <2863311531>;
> > > > + fsl,tmr-fiper1 = <999999995>;
> > > > + fsl,tmr-fiper2 = <99990>;
> > > > + fsl,max-adj = <299999999>;
> > > > };
> >
> > And here, you're changing the value of fsl,tmr-add and fsl,max-adj. Why?
>
> The old values maybe not calculated base on the default eTSEC system clock
> value.
> 1588 timer couldn’t be adjusted correctly by old values.
Explain in the changelog what was wrong with the old values (don't just say
"Fix 1588 timer node in file").
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists