[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150724163425.GY3550@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:34:25 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>,
"fu.wei@...aro.org" <fu.wei@...aro.org>,
"al.stone@...aro.org" <al.stone@...aro.org>,
"bp @ alien8 . de Matt Fleming" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 3/5] arm64: mm: add PROT_DEVICE_nGnRnE and
PROT_NORMAL_WT
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:26:54PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:15:00PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:59:18PM +0100, Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang wrote:
> > > *
> > > * n = AttrIndx[2:0]
> > > * n MAIR
> > > @@ -303,12 +303,14 @@ ENTRY(__cpu_setup)
> > > * DEVICE_GRE 010 00001100
> > > * NORMAL_NC 011 01000100
> > > * NORMAL 100 11111111
> > > + * NORMAL_WT 101 10111011
> >
> > I don't think the write allocation hint makes much sense for WT memory
> > (though it shouldn't cause issues either). Just use 10101010.
>
> The EFI spec actually specifies the 1011 1011 encoding, so I think we should
> follow that.
OK (I didn't bother reading the spec).
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists