lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:56:42 -0400
From:	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] sched: Migrate sched to use new tick dependency
 mask model

On 07/23/2015 12:42 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> +static inline void sched_update_tick_dependency(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
> +		return;
> +
> +	cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> +
> +	if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(rq->cpu))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (sched_can_stop_tick(rq))
> +		tick_nohz_clear_tick_dependency_cpu(TICK_SCHED_BIT, cpu);
> +	else
> +		tick_nohz_set_tick_dependency_cpu(TICK_SCHED_BIT, cpu);
> +}

Is it worth asserting that the rq is locked at this point? Presumably 
that's a requirement so that the cpu can't change out from under you.
-- 
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ