[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B27300.80801@opensource.altera.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:16:48 -0500
From: Graham Moore <grmoore@...nsource.altera.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
CC: <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>,
Yves Vandervennet <yvanderv@...nsource.altera.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: Bindings for Cadence Quad SPI Flash
Controller driver.
On 07/24/2015 11:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Friday, July 24, 2015 at 06:12:01 PM, Graham Moore wrote:
>> On 07/24/2015 07:45 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 02:36:21 PM, Graham Moore wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Graham Moore <grmoore@...nsource.altera.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> V2: Add cdns prefix to driver-specific bindings.
>>>> V3: Use existing property "is-decoded-cs" instead of creating a
>>>> duplicate, "ext-decoder". Timing parameters are in nanoseconds, not
>>>> master reference clocks. Remove bus-num completely.
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> do you plan to continue on this driver any soon? If not, I'd like to take
>>> over the mainlining if you're not opposed. I'd like to see this in
>>> mainline soon.
>>
>> I don't have a problem with you taking over the mainlining. I've been
>> stalled on the micron quad protocol issue that Cyrille Pitchen has solved.
>
> Do you mean the protocol change notification please?
>
Yes, that's what I mean, the protocol change notification.
>>> btw you'll need some kind of a variation on the attached two patches in
>>> the next iteration.
>>
>> I have a V5 with fixes for sparse and smatch issues. Do you want me to
>> post it and you add those two patches? Alternatively I can incorporate
>> them into my V5.
>
> Please post those patches, yup, that'd be nice :)
>
> Also, just squash those two micropatches into yours, no problem.
>
> Be careful about the 0002 patch, see the commit message. I do NOT think
> it is correct to pass the pdev->dev which represents the controller, not
> the subnode, into spi_nor_scan() in cqspi_probe() . I might be wrong here
> though, I am not sure. I think Brian or David would be much better people
> to comment on this part.
>
I'm doing it the way fsl_quadspi.c does it. It works on my Cyclone5
test system with and without that 0002 patch. So maybe I'll leave it
out for now.
V5 patches on the way...
BR,
Graham
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists