linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fixed comments without */ on a separate line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1437841372-30713-1-git-send-email-mario.bambagini@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 25 Jul 2015 18:22:51 +0200
From:	Mario Bambagini <mario.bambagini@...il.com>
To:	oleg.drokin@...el.com
Cc:	andreas.dilger@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mario.bambagini@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: fixed comments without */ on a separate line

this set of patches fixes several code style problems:
-patch 1: comments without */ on a separate line
-patch 2: lines with more than 80 chars

This patch fixes 4 comments without */ on a new line

Signed-off-by: Mario Bambagini <mario.bambagini@...il.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c
index a626871..119f017 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c
@@ -206,7 +206,8 @@ static int capa_thread_main(void *unused)
 			 * lock.
 			 */
 			/* ibits may be changed by ll_have_md_lock() so we have
-			 * to set it each time */
+			 * to set it each time
+			 */
 			ibits = MDS_INODELOCK_LOOKUP;
 			if (capa_for_mds(&ocapa->c_capa) &&
 			    !S_ISDIR(ocapa->u.cli.inode->i_mode) &&
@@ -225,7 +226,8 @@ static int capa_thread_main(void *unused)
 			if (capa_for_oss(&ocapa->c_capa) &&
 			    obd_capa_open_count(ocapa) == 0) {
 				/* oss capa with open count == 0 won't renew,
-				 * move to idle list */
+				 * move to idle list
+				 */
 				sort_add_capa(ocapa, &ll_idle_capas);
 				continue;
 			}
@@ -447,7 +449,8 @@ static inline void inode_add_oss_capa(struct inode *inode,
 	struct list_head *next = NULL;
 
 	/* capa is sorted in lli_oss_capas so lookup can always find the
-	 * latest one */
+	 * latest one
+	 */
 	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &lli->lli_oss_capas, u.cli.lli_list) {
 		if (cfs_time_after(ocapa->c_expiry, tmp->c_expiry)) {
 			next = &tmp->u.cli.lli_list;
@@ -537,7 +540,8 @@ static int ll_update_capa(struct obd_capa *ocapa, struct lustre_capa *capa)
 			ll_capa_renewal_failed++;
 
 			/* failed capa won't be renewed any longer, but if -EIO,
-			 * client might be doing recovery, retry in 2 min. */
+			 * client might be doing recovery, retry in 2 min.
+			 */
 			if (rc == -EIO && !capa_is_expired(ocapa)) {
 				delay_capa_renew(ocapa, 120);
 				DEBUG_CAPA(D_ERROR, &ocapa->c_capa,
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/