lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 16:09:52 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>, Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Add pending bit support On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 16:12 -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > Using a locking microbenchmark on the same system, the locking > rates in (kops/s) were: > > Threads Rate w/o patch Rate with patch > ------- -------------- --------------- > 2 (same socket) 6,515,265 7,077,476 > 2 (diff sockets) 2,967,145 4,353,851 At this level stddev would be nice to have, as these sort of things have a lot of variation. Out of general interest, are these microbenchmarks available? Would you care to add something like that to perf-bench? I assume they would probably be x86 specific. Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists