[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1437891661-32007-1-git-send-email-noamc@ezchip.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 09:21:01 +0300
From: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
CC: <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>, <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
<adilger@...ger.ca>, <giladb@...hip.com>,
Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: heap/bss calculation ignore section above STACK_TOP.
From: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
Today bss/heap is placed above last loaded sections.
Current check is only against TASK_SIZE, maybe since most architectures do:
But this is not true for all of them and a gap between TASK_SIZE
and STACK_TOP is possible and may be used for variant purposes.
For example we use it for a special physical memory mapping.
In such case of section in this gap we skip it for matter of
heap/bss calculation.
set_brk will never work for such case anyway.
Signed-off-by: Noam Camus <noamc@...hip.com>
---
fs/binfmt_elf.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
index 6b65996..e445886 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -962,6 +962,9 @@ static int load_elf_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
k = elf_ppnt->p_vaddr + elf_ppnt->p_filesz;
+ if (k >= STACK_TOP)
+ continue;
+
if (k > elf_bss)
elf_bss = k;
if ((elf_ppnt->p_flags & PF_X) && end_code < k)
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists