[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150726191411.GB5371@mwanda>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 22:14:11 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Mario Bambagini <mario.bambagini@...il.com>
Cc: oleg.drokin@...el.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, andreas.dilger@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: lustre: fixed 80-char rule
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 06:22:52PM +0200, Mario Bambagini wrote:
> This patch fixes 2 lines longer than 80 chars
>
> The first one is a function whose argument has been moved to next line.
> The second one is a comment split on two lines
>
> The script checkpatch does not complain anymore
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Bambagini <mario.bambagini@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c
> index 119f017..1f72066 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_capa.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,8 @@ static unsigned long long ll_capa_renewal_retries;
>
> static int ll_update_capa(struct obd_capa *ocapa, struct lustre_capa *capa);
>
> -static inline void update_capa_timer(struct obd_capa *ocapa, unsigned long expiry)
> +static inline void update_capa_timer(struct obd_capa *ocapa,
> + unsigned long expiry)
This is wrong. Run your patch through checkpatch.pl --strict and it
will help you.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists