[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1437975638-789-3-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 22:40:30 -0700
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] perf: Split perf_event_read() and perf_event_count()
perf_event_read() does two things:
- call the PMU to read/update the counter value, and
- compute the total count of the event and its children
Not all callers need both. perf_event_reset() for instance needs the
first piece but doesn't need the second. Similarly, when we implement
the ability to read a group of events using the transaction interface,
we would need the two pieces done independently.
Break up perf_event_read() and have it just read/update the counter
and have the callers compute the total count if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 4435bf5..f9ca8cb 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3212,7 +3212,7 @@ static inline u64 perf_event_count(struct perf_event *event)
return __perf_event_count(event);
}
-static u64 perf_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
+static void perf_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
{
/*
* If event is enabled and currently active on a CPU, update the
@@ -3238,8 +3238,6 @@ static u64 perf_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
update_event_times(event);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
}
-
- return perf_event_count(event);
}
/*
@@ -3751,14 +3749,18 @@ u64 perf_event_read_value(struct perf_event *event, u64 *enabled, u64 *running)
*running = 0;
mutex_lock(&event->child_mutex);
- total += perf_event_read(event);
+
+ perf_event_read(event);
+ total += perf_event_count(event);
+
*enabled += event->total_time_enabled +
atomic64_read(&event->child_total_time_enabled);
*running += event->total_time_running +
atomic64_read(&event->child_total_time_running);
list_for_each_entry(child, &event->child_list, child_list) {
- total += perf_event_read(child);
+ perf_event_read(child);
+ total += perf_event_count(child);
*enabled += child->total_time_enabled;
*running += child->total_time_running;
}
@@ -3918,7 +3920,7 @@ static unsigned int perf_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
static void _perf_event_reset(struct perf_event *event)
{
- (void)perf_event_read(event);
+ perf_event_read(event);
local64_set(&event->count, 0);
perf_event_update_userpage(event);
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists