linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dmaengine: Add an enum for the dmaengine alignment constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150727090950.37122de2@free-electrons.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:09:50 +0200
From:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dmaengine: Add an enum for the dmaengine
 alignment constraints

Maxime,

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:48:04 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:

> I could, but all the rest of the other similar case so far in
> dmaengine are made through enum, so I guess it's still better for
> consistency. And we also provide a comprehensive list of the valid
> values this way, something a function would not provide (or at least
> not at compilation time)

Alright, makes sense.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/