[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150727084020.GA28336@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:40:20 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Justin M. Forbes" <jforbes@...oraproject.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] block: loop: prepare for supporing direct IO
> + /*
> + * loop block's logical block size is 512, now
> + * we support direct I/O only if the backing
> + * block devices' minimize I/O size is 512 and
> + * the offset is aligned with 512.
> + */
> + if (dio) {
> + if (inode->i_sb->s_bdev &&
> + bdev_io_min(inode->i_sb->s_bdev) == 512 &&
> + !(lo->lo_offset & 511))
Why the hardcoded value? I suspect this should be more like:
if (dio && inode->i_sb->s_bdev &&
(lo->lo_offset & (bdev_io_min(inode->i_sb->s_bdev) - 1)) != 0)
dio = false;
> + blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
> + lo->use_dio = use_dio;
> + if (use_dio)
> + lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO;
> + else
> + lo->lo_flags &= ~LO_FLAGS_DIRECT_IO;
> + blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
Locking?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists