[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150727091535.GA9169@leverpostej>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:16:17 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: "Chalamarla, Tirumalesh" <Tirumalesh.Chalamarla@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Robin Murphy <Robin.Murphy@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"treding@...dia.com" <treding@...dia.com>,
"Daney, David" <David.Daney@...iumnetworks.com>,
"majun258@...wei.com" <majun258@...wei.com>,
"thunder.leizhen@...wei.com" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
"laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com"
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Docs: dt: Add PCI MSI map bindings
> > +Example (5)
> > +===========
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > +
> > + msi_a: msi-controller@a {
> > + reg = <0xa 0x1>;
> > + compatible = "vendor,some-controller";
> > + msi-controller;
> > + #msi-cells = <1>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + msi_b: msi-controller@b {
> > + reg = <0xb 0x1>;
> > + compatible = "vendor,some-controller";
> > + msi-controller;
> > + #msi-cells = <1>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + msi_c: msi-controller@c {
> > + reg = <0xc 0x1>;
> > + compatible = "vendor,some-controller";
> > + msi-controller;
> > + #msi-cells = <1>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + pci: pci@c {
> > + reg = <0xf 0x1>;
> > + compatible = "vendor,pcie-root-complex";
> > + device_type = "pci";
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The sideband data provided to MSI controller a is the
> > + * RID, but the high bit of the bus number is negated.
> > + * The sideband data provided to MSI controller b is the
> > + * RID, identity-mapped.
> > + * MSI controller c is not addressable.
> > + */
> > + msi-map = <0x0000 &msi_a 0x8000 0x08000>,
> > + <0x8000 &msi_a 0x0000 0x08000>,
> > + <0x0000 &msi_b 0x0000 0x10000>;
> > + };
>
> they can be identical right? like
> <0x8000 &msi_a 0x0000 0x08000>,
> <0x8000 &msi_b 0x0000 0x08000>;
In general that would be valid, yes.
In this case two entries are required for MSI controller a because the
high bit passed to it is negated. This does not occur for MSI controller
b, so it only requires a single entry to describe the transformation.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists