linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: dts: mt8173: Add subsystem clock controller device nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <24796517.2pfRdOOmRJ@ubix>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 03:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:	James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>
Cc:	Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Heiko Stubner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
	Ricky Liang <jcliang@...omium.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64: dts: mt8173: Add subsystem clock controller device nodes

On Monday, July 27, 2015 10:56:22 AM James Liao wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 19:32 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > > @@ -88,6 +88,13 @@
> > > 
> > >                 #clock-cells = <0>;
> > >         
> > >         };
> > > 
> > > +       cpum_ck: dummy_clk {
> > 
> > I'm not a big fan of this "dummy_clk".
> > The 'name' part of the devicetree node is supposed to be generic.
> > So, perhaps just oscillator@2, and move it down below clk32k:
> > oscillator@1.
> 
> > Otherwise:
> cpum_ck is a test clock which only available in IC test. It's empty on
> MT8173 evaluation or production boards. Should we name this kind of
> empty clock as an oscillator? Or is there a better name for it?
> 

So if it will never be part of any available boards, why do you want to add 
it?

Regards,
Matthias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/