linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/7] cpufreq: Drop unused dev argument from two functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1650994.NqTPmayJcx@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:05:21 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] cpufreq: Drop unused dev argument from two functions

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

The dev argument of cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() and
cpufreq_add_dev_interface() is not used by any of them,
so drop it.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -999,8 +999,7 @@ static void cpufreq_remove_dev_symlink(s
 	}
 }
 
-static int cpufreq_add_dev_interface(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-				     struct device *dev)
+static int cpufreq_add_dev_interface(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	struct freq_attr **drv_attr;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -1057,8 +1056,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init_policy(struct cp
 	return cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
 }
 
-static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-				  unsigned int cpu, struct device *dev)
+static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -1225,7 +1223,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device
 	if (policy) {
 		WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus));
 		if (!policy_is_inactive(policy))
-			return cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev);
+			return cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
 
 		/* This is the only online CPU for the policy.  Start over. */
 		recover_policy = true;
@@ -1328,7 +1326,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device
 				     CPUFREQ_START, policy);
 
 	if (!recover_policy) {
-		ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy, dev);
+		ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy);
 		if (ret)
 			goto out_exit_policy;
 		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/