linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: Rework two functions related to CPU offline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150727144250.GC18535@linux>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:12:50 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: Rework two functions related to CPU offline

On 27-07-15, 16:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Since __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare() and __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()
> are about CPU offline rather than about CPU removal, rename them to
> cpufreq_offline_prepare() and cpufreq_offline_finish(), respectively.
> 
> Also change their argument from a struct device pointer to a CPU
> number, because they use the CPU number only internally anyway
> and make them void as their return values are ignored.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   32 ++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/