[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1437959930.25997.33.camel@stgolabs.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:18:50 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] locking/qspinlock: Enhance pvqspinlock
performance
On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 16:12 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> Patch 3 allows the collection of various count data that are useful
> to see what is happening in the system. They do add a bit of overhead
> when enabled slowing performance a tiny bit.
Ah ok you do mention the overhead. Hmmm but what's a tiny bit? A kernel
build comparison would be pretty nice to have a "usability" view.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists