linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 12:18:52 -0400
From:	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config
 option

On 07/27/2015 11:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Boris Ostrovsky
> <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com> wrote:
>> On 07/25/2015 01:36 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> Here's v3.  It fixes the "dazed and confused" issue, I hope.  It's also
>>> probably a good general attack surface reduction, and it replaces some
>>> scary code with IMO less scary code.
>>>
>>> Also, servers and embedded systems should probably turn off modify_ldt.
>>> This makes that possible.
>>>
>>> Xen people, can you take a look at this?
>>>
>>> Willy and Kees: I left the config option alone.  The -tiny people will
>>> like it, and we can always add a sysctl of some sort later.
>>>
>>> Changes from v3:
>>>    - Hopefully fixed Xen.
>>
>> 32b-on-32b fails in the same manner. (but non-zero LDT is taken care of)
>>
>>>    - Fixed 32-bit test case on 32-bit native kernel.
>>
>> I am not sure I see what changed.
> I misplaced the fix in the wrong git commit, so I failed to sent it.  Oops.
>
> I just sent v4.1 of patch 3.  Can you try that?


I am hitting BUG() in Xen code (returning from a hypercall) when freeing 
LDT in destroy_context(). Interestingly though when I run the test in 
the debugger I get SIGILL (just like before) but no BUG().

Let me get back to you on that later today.


-boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/