[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B6663B.2060707@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:11:23 -0400
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Add pending bit support
On 07/26/2015 07:09 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 16:12 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> Using a locking microbenchmark on the same system, the locking
>> rates in (kops/s) were:
>>
>> Threads Rate w/o patch Rate with patch
>> ------- -------------- ---------------
>> 2 (same socket) 6,515,265 7,077,476
>> 2 (diff sockets) 2,967,145 4,353,851
> At this level stddev would be nice to have, as these sort of things have
> a lot of variation.
>
> Out of general interest, are these microbenchmarks available? Would you
> care to add something like that to perf-bench? I assume they would
> probably be x86 specific.
Ingo has asked similar question and he suggested doing an user-space
implementation in perf bench. I will take a further look at that when I
have time.
Cheers,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists