[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150727181318.GA16393@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:13:18 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
avanzini.arianna@...il.com, kernel-team@...com, hannes@...xchg.org,
lizefan@...wei.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET block/for-4.3] blkcg: implement interface for the
unified hierarchy
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:12:09PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> I browsed though the details of above knobs and it sounds great. It is
> clean and much less number of knobs and files. You got rid of all the
> debug CFQ knobs which is good. I was not happy with these either. Glad
Yeah, especially given that CFQ may be replaced by BFQ.
> to see that all the magic about leaf weight is gone. That was really
> mind bending. Knob for reset stats is gone and instead of mutiple files
> for configuration now we are using single file for R/W BPS/IOPS
> configuration.
>
> I will do some basic testing and see if something pops up.
>
> Userspace will need to understand these new files but that's the
> understanding anyway that unified hierarchy is different and needs
> to be handled differently.
For blkcg (and memory too), the usage model changes so drastically
that I don't think blkcg interface changes would matter much.
Everything is changed anyway.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists