[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150727015850.4928.15194.stgit@softrs>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:58:50 +0900
From: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: [V2 PATCH 2/3] kexec: Fix race between panic() and crash_kexec()
called directly
Currently, panic() and crash_kexec() can be called at the same time.
For example (x86 case):
CPU 0:
oops_end()
crash_kexec()
mutex_trylock() // acquired
nmi_shootdown_cpus() // stop other cpus
CPU 1:
panic()
crash_kexec()
mutex_trylock() // failed to acquire
smp_send_stop() // stop other cpus
infinite loop
If CPU 1 calls smp_send_stop() before nmi_shootdown_cpus(), kdump
fails.
In another case:
CPU 0:
oops_end()
crash_kexec()
mutex_trylock() // acquired
<NMI>
io_check_error()
panic()
crash_kexec()
mutex_trylock() // failed to acquire
infinite loop
Clearly, this is an undesirable result.
To fix this problem, this patch changes crash_kexec() to exclude
others by using atomic_t panicking_cpu.
V2:
- Use atomic_cmpxchg() instead of spin_trylock() on panic_lock
to exclude concurrent accesses
- Don't introduce no-lock version of crash_kexec()
Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/kexec.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/kexec.c b/kernel/kexec.c
index a785c10..ca40a19 100644
--- a/kernel/kexec.c
+++ b/kernel/kexec.c
@@ -1472,6 +1472,18 @@ void __weak crash_unmap_reserved_pages(void)
void crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ int old_cpu, this_cpu;
+
+ /*
+ * `old_cpu == -1' means we are the first comer and crash_kexec()
+ * was called without entering panic().
+ * `old_cpu == this_cpu' means crash_kexec() was called from panic().
+ */
+ this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+ old_cpu = atomic_cmpxchg(&panicking_cpu, -1, this_cpu);
+ if (old_cpu != -1 && old_cpu != this_cpu)
+ return;
+
/* Take the kexec_mutex here to prevent sys_kexec_load
* running on one cpu from replacing the crash kernel
* we are using after a panic on a different cpu.
@@ -1491,6 +1503,14 @@ void crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
mutex_unlock(&kexec_mutex);
}
+
+ /*
+ * If we came here from panic(), we have to keep panicking_cpu
+ * to prevent other cpus from entering panic(). Otherwise,
+ * resetting it so that other cpus can enter panic()/crash_kexec().
+ */
+ if (old_cpu == this_cpu)
+ atomic_set(&panicking_cpu, -1);
}
size_t crash_get_memory_size(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists