[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150727051258.GB15836@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:12:58 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
"Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@...com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/25] arch: introduce memremap()
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 10:49:39AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:38:42PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> The behavior change to return NULL on an unsupported request is reserved
> >> for a later patch.
> >
> > Why?
>
> This is for drivers like pmem that care about the mapping type. For
> example, if pmem can't get a cache-enabled mapping it is potentially
> putting the write durability of the persistent media at risk.
I understand that part, but the question is why the old behavior
is retained for now and only changed later.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists