[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1438029228-20560-5-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 22:33:48 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Krzysztof A. Sobiecki" <sobkas@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] x86/asm/entry/32: Simplify FLAGS_NT clearing in SYSENTER32 code.
"sysenter_fix_flags" detour does not need to be convoluted anymore,
straigten it up. However, we still use this:
jnz 2f
jmp sysenter_jumps_here
2: ...
instead of this:
jz sysenter_jumps_here
...
because "cold" conditional forward branch is predicted not taken
by most CPUs - exactly what we want. Latter version would get it wrong.
Reinstate "why we use SYSRETL instead of SYSEXIT" comment.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Krzysztof A. Sobiecki <sobkas@...il.com>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
CC: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
CC: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: x86@...nel.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
index 73b56a5..bd3664f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
@@ -98,20 +98,28 @@ ENTRY(entry_SYSENTER_compat)
ASM_CLAC
/*
- * Sysenter doesn't filter flags, so we need to clear NT
- * ourselves. To save a few cycles, we can check whether
- * NT was set instead of doing an unconditional popfq.
+ * Sysenter doesn't filter flags, so we need to clear NT ourselves.
*/
testl $X86_EFLAGS_NT, EFLAGS(%rsp)
- jnz sysenter_fix_flags
-sysenter_flags_fixed:
+ jnz 2f
jmp sysenter_jumps_here
-
-sysenter_fix_flags:
+2:
pushq $(X86_EFLAGS_IF|X86_EFLAGS_FIXED)
popfq
- jmp sysenter_flags_fixed
-
+ jmp sysenter_jumps_here
+ /*
+ * SYSEXIT insn is not obviously safe for 64-bit kernels --
+ * an NMI between STI and SYSEXIT has poorly specified behavior,
+ * and NMI followed by an IRQ with usergs is fatal.
+ * So we just pretend we're using SYSEXIT but we really use
+ * SYSRETL instead. (Yes, SYSRETL works even on Intel CPUs.)
+ * We do that by reusing the entire SYSCALL code path:
+ * the jump above takes us there.
+ *
+ * The difference of SYSENTER 32-bit ABI versus SYSCALL
+ * is that SYSENTER ABI does not promise to preserve EDX and EBP,
+ * SYSCALL does.
+ */
ENDPROC(entry_SYSENTER_compat)
/*
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists