[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVa3QC3S2zxUPPzR=M74tHsaZuV0sKtWZoPEV4URTHgSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:40:00 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Krzysztof A. Sobiecki" <sobkas@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/asm/entry/32: Simplify FLAGS_NT clearing in
SYSENTER32 code.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
> "sysenter_fix_flags" detour does not need to be convoluted anymore,
> straigten it up. However, we still use this:
>
> jnz 2f
> jmp sysenter_jumps_here
> 2: ...
>
> instead of this:
>
> jz sysenter_jumps_here
> ...
>
> because "cold" conditional forward branch is predicted not taken
> by most CPUs - exactly what we want. Latter version would get it wrong.
>
> Reinstate "why we use SYSRETL instead of SYSEXIT" comment.
>
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists