[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1438110564-19932-1-git-send-email-cburden@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:09:24 -0700
From: Cassidy Burden <cburden@...eaurora.org>
To: yury.norov@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Cassidy Burden <cburden@...eaurora.org>,
Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] lib: Make _find_next_bit helper function inline
I've tested Yury Norov's find_bit reimplementation with the test_find_bit
module (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/8/141) and measured about 35-40%
performance degradation on arm64 3.18 run with fixed CPU frequency.
The performance degradation appears to be caused by the
helper function _find_next_bit. After inlining this function into
find_next_bit and find_next_zero_bit I get slightly better performance
than the old implementation:
find_next_zero_bit find_next_bit
old new inline old new inline
26 36 24 24 33 23
25 36 24 24 33 23
26 36 24 24 33 23
25 36 24 24 33 23
25 36 24 24 33 23
25 37 24 24 33 23
25 37 24 24 33 23
25 37 24 24 33 23
25 36 24 24 33 23
25 37 24 24 33 23
Signed-off-by: Cassidy Burden <cburden@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@...il.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
---
lib/find_bit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/find_bit.c b/lib/find_bit.c
index 18072ea..d0e04f9 100644
--- a/lib/find_bit.c
+++ b/lib/find_bit.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
* find_next_zero_bit. The difference is the "invert" argument, which
* is XORed with each fetched word before searching it for one bits.
*/
-static unsigned long _find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
+static inline unsigned long _find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr,
unsigned long nbits, unsigned long start, unsigned long invert)
{
unsigned long tmp;
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists