lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72454140.319490.1438109162683.JavaMail.zimbra@xes-inc.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:46:02 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Aaron Sierra <asierra@...-inc.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Peter Tyser <ptyser@...-inc.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] iTCO_wdt: Expose watchdog properties using platform
 data

> > > > @@ -933,7 +956,7 @@ gpe0_done:
> > > >  	lpc_chipset_info[priv->chipset].use_gpio = ret;
> > > >  	lpc_ich_enable_gpio_space(dev);
> > > >  
> > > > -	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO]);
> > > > +	lpc_ich_finalize_gpio_cell(dev);
> > > >  	ret = mfd_add_devices(&dev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > > >  			      &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_GPIO], 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -1007,7 +1030,10 @@ static int lpc_ich_init_wdt(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > > >  		res->end = base_addr + ACPIBASE_PMC_END;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > -	lpc_ich_finalize_cell(dev, &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT]);
> > > > +	ret = lpc_ich_finalize_wdt_cell(dev);
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		goto wdt_done;
> > > > +
> > > >  	ret = mfd_add_devices(&dev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > > >  			      &lpc_ich_cells[LPC_WDT], 1, NULL, 0, NULL);
> > > 
> > > Why do you have an mfd_add_devices() call for each device?
> >  
> > Good question. This call has been present since March 2012 when support
> > was first added for iTCO_wdt in commit 887c8ec7219f ("watchdog: Convert
> > iTCO_wdt driver to mfd model").
> > 
> > There's no good reason that I can see. Aaron?

I chose to call mfd_add_devices() in each device init function
because I thought it was the easiest way to avoid registering an
incomplete/invalid MFD cell should an error occur during init.

That way device registration wouldn't be an all-or-nothing affair.

Doesn't mfd_add_devices() bail out after the first unsuccessful
mfd to platform device translation?

-Aaron S.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ