[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJmxDmRZTF1BFG5p3KfCTuBLLWFNNzxtDyacWJp4S=mTW7Aoww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:55:40 -0700
From: Ricky Zhou <rickyz@...gle.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] user_ns: use correct check for single-threadedness
(apologies for the dup, forgot to reply all)
userns_install in user_namespace.c (affects setns of a user
namespace): cde1975bc242f3e1072bde623ef378e547b73f91.
The check in check_unshare_flags is a little more complex. The
incorrect check was added in
cf2e340f4249b781b3d2beb41e891d08581f0e10 but I don't think it would
have triggered under any supported combination of flags at that point.
>From 50804fe3737ca6a5942fdc2057a18a8141d00141 until
6e556ce209b09528dbf1931cbfd5d323e1345926, the bug affected
unshare(CLONE_NEWPID).
>From b2e0d98705e60e45bbb3c0032c48824ad7ae0704 onward,
unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER) is affected.
Thanks,
Ricky
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
>
>> From: Ricky Zhou <rickyz@...omium.org>
>>
>> Checking mm_users > 1 does not mean a process is multithreaded. For
>> example, reading /proc/PID/maps temporarily increments mm_users, allowing
>> other processes to (accidentally) interfere with unshare() calls.
>>
>> This fixes observed failures of unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER) incorrectly
>> returning EINVAL if another processes happened to be simultaneously
>> reading the maps file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ricky Zhou <rickyz@...omium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>
> This looks like a good fix. Any chance you can drudge up the commit where
> this hack came in so that Greg & Company know how far to back port this?
>
>> ---
>> kernel/fork.c | 4 ++--
>> kernel/user_namespace.c | 3 ++-
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
>> index dbd9b8d7b7cc..7d138f152dcd 100644
>> --- a/kernel/fork.c
>> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
>> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
>> #include <linux/aio.h>
>> #include <linux/compiler.h>
>> #include <linux/sysctl.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>> #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>> @@ -1876,8 +1877,7 @@ static int check_unshare_flags(unsigned long unshare_flags)
>> * needs to unshare vm.
>> */
>> if (unshare_flags & (CLONE_THREAD | CLONE_SIGHAND | CLONE_VM)) {
>> - /* FIXME: get_task_mm() increments ->mm_users */
>> - if (atomic_read(¤t->mm->mm_users) > 1)
>> + if (!current_is_single_threaded())
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/user_namespace.c b/kernel/user_namespace.c
>> index 4109f8320684..7e0e021e4304 100644
>> --- a/kernel/user_namespace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>> #include <linux/ctype.h>
>> #include <linux/projid.h>
>> #include <linux/fs_struct.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>>
>> static struct kmem_cache *user_ns_cachep __read_mostly;
>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(userns_state_mutex);
>> @@ -977,7 +978,7 @@ static int userns_install(struct nsproxy *nsproxy, struct ns_common *ns)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> /* Threaded processes may not enter a different user namespace */
>> - if (atomic_read(¤t->mm->mm_users) > 1)
>> + if (!current_is_single_threaded())
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> if (current->fs->users != 1)
>> --
>> 1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists