linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] clk: exynos4: Fix wrong clock for Exynos4x12 ADC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150728214126.GA3159@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:41:26 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
Cc:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: exynos4: Fix wrong clock for Exynos4x12 ADC

On 07/26, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 07/22/2015 08:41 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >On 22.07.2015 07:42, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>>On 06/12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> [...]
> >>>>>Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski<k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> >>>>>Cc:<stable@...r.kernel.org>
> >>>>>Fixes: c63c57433003 ("ARM: dts: Add ADC's dt data to read raw data for exynos4x12")
> >>>>>Link:https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/11/85
> >>>
> >>>Did you want clk maintainers to apply this? The To: list is not
> >>>helping so I'm not sure what's going on and it seems to have
> >>>slipped through the cracks.
> >
> >Thank you for being proactive! I appreciate this.
> >Some time ago Sylwester replied that he took care about this patch so I
> >think this will go through Samsung clock tree.
> >
> >Sylwester, are you planning to send this as fix for 4.2-rc?
> 
> I think it qualifies for 4.3, it's not a new regression and will be
> backported to -stable anyway.
> I would prefer clk maintainers have applied this, otherwise I would
> need to make a (questionable) pull request with only one patch, since
> all patches except this one after the last merge window were part
> of bigger series touching multiple subsystems and applied through
> the samsung soc tree.
> 

Ok. Applied to clk-next.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/