[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B71633.8060608@monstr.eu>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:42:11 +0200
From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
Cc: p.zabel@...gutronix.de, mark.rutland@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
pawel.moll@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 2/3] dts: zynq: Add devicetree entry for Xilinx Zynq reset
controller.
On 07/28/2015 07:03 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> I agree we need to be careful with changing the bindings.
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu> wrote:
>> Hi Moritz,
>>
>> On 07/25/2015 02:21 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 43 ++++++++++++-
>>
>> This patch is nice in general but every change in binding should be
>> discussed separately. There is also necessary to wire them up in the
>> driver to do action. That's why I think that will be the best just to
>> add the code to slcr and keep others untouched.
>
> Ok, just to clarify: You'd suggest to just add the rstc as child node
> to the slcr,
> and leave the other nodes untouched?
yes and then add it on case-by-case basis.
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists