[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVWR6CchcdR1OHohH5VeXTDFyz_Jfg9eWW_DNYOB0kZjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:41:48 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Uros Bizjak <uros_bizjak1@....net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: ASM flags in general
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 5:35 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> However... perhaps we can do the flags stuff first? There are certainly a ton of changes we ought to do.
>
Fine with me. Flags are probably more generally useful, especially
because of the silly lack of output constraints on asm goto.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists