lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150728074730.GP21114@x1>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:47:30 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] ACPI / PM: Attach ACPI power domain only once

On Mon, 27 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Some devices, like MFD subdevices, share a single ACPI companion device so
> that they are able to access their resources and children. However,
> currently all these subdevices are attached to the ACPI power domain and
> this might cause that the power methods for the companion device get called
> more than once.
> 
> In order to solve this we attach the ACPI power domain only to the first
> physical device that is bound to the ACPI companion device. In case of MFD
> devices, this is the parent MFD device itself.
> 
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/device_pm.c |  8 ++++++++
>  drivers/acpi/internal.h  |  2 ++
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c      | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.  Pull request to follow.

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> index 717afcd..08dc3ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
> @@ -1123,6 +1123,14 @@ int acpi_dev_pm_attach(struct device *dev, bool power_on)
>  	if (dev->pm_domain)
>  		return -EEXIST;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Only attach the power domain to the first device if the
> +	 * companion is shared by multiple. This is to prevent doing power
> +	 * management twice.
> +	 */
> +	if (!acpi_device_is_first_physical_node(adev, dev))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
>  	acpi_add_pm_notifier(adev, dev, acpi_pm_notify_work_func);
>  	dev->pm_domain = &acpi_general_pm_domain;
>  	if (power_on) {
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> index 4683a96..f6aefe9 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ void acpi_device_add_finalize(struct acpi_device *device);
>  void acpi_free_pnp_ids(struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp);
>  bool acpi_device_is_present(struct acpi_device *adev);
>  bool acpi_device_is_battery(struct acpi_device *adev);
> +bool acpi_device_is_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev,
> +					const struct device *dev);
>  
>  /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                    Power Resource
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index ec25635..89ff6d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,35 @@ static int create_of_modalias(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev, char *modalias,
>  	return len;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * acpi_device_is_first_physical_node - Is given dev first physical node
> + * @adev: ACPI companion device
> + * @dev: Physical device to check
> + *
> + * Function checks if given @dev is the first physical devices attached to
> + * the ACPI companion device. This distinction is needed in some cases
> + * where the same companion device is shared between many physical devices.
> + *
> + * Note that the caller have to provide valid @adev pointer.
> + */
> +bool acpi_device_is_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev,
> +					const struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	bool ret = false;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> +	if (!list_empty(&adev->physical_node_list)) {
> +		const struct acpi_device_physical_node *node;
> +
> +		node = list_first_entry(&adev->physical_node_list,
> +					struct acpi_device_physical_node, node);
> +		ret = node->dev == dev;
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * acpi_companion_match() - Can we match via ACPI companion device
>   * @dev: Device in question
> @@ -250,7 +279,6 @@ static int create_of_modalias(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev, char *modalias,
>  static struct acpi_device *acpi_companion_match(const struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct acpi_device *adev;
> -	struct mutex *physical_node_lock;
>  
>  	adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
>  	if (!adev)
> @@ -259,21 +287,7 @@ static struct acpi_device *acpi_companion_match(const struct device *dev)
>  	if (list_empty(&adev->pnp.ids))
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	physical_node_lock = &adev->physical_node_lock;
> -	mutex_lock(physical_node_lock);
> -	if (list_empty(&adev->physical_node_list)) {
> -		adev = NULL;
> -	} else {
> -		const struct acpi_device_physical_node *node;
> -
> -		node = list_first_entry(&adev->physical_node_list,
> -					struct acpi_device_physical_node, node);
> -		if (node->dev != dev)
> -			adev = NULL;
> -	}
> -	mutex_unlock(physical_node_lock);
> -
> -	return adev;
> +	return acpi_device_is_first_physical_node(adev, dev) ? adev : NULL;
>  }
>  
>  static int __acpi_device_uevent_modalias(struct acpi_device *adev,

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ