linux-kernel - Re: [RFCv2 1/3] docs: dts: Added documentation for Xilinx Zynq Reset Controller bindings.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1438070702.3193.4.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:05:02 +0200
From:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:	Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
Cc:	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	michal.simek@...inx.com, soren.brinkmann@...inx.com,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 1/3] docs: dts: Added documentation for Xilinx Zynq
 Reset Controller bindings.

Am Freitag, den 24.07.2015, 17:21 -0700 schrieb Moritz Fischer:
> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ac4499e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/zynq-reset-pl.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +Xilinx Zynq PL Reset Manager
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl"
> +- syscon <&slcr>;
> +- #reset-cells: 1
> +
> +Example:
> +	rstc: rstc@240 {
> +		#reset-cells = <1>;
> +		compatible = "xlnx,zynq-reset-pl";
> +		syscon = <&slcr>;

Why the syscon phandle if rstc always is the child of slcr? Why not just
request the syscon for the rstc's parent node.

> +	};

regards
Philipp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/