[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150728004746.GT12927@tiger>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:47:47 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Shenwei Wang <Shenwei.Wang@...escale.com>
Cc: "jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Huang Anson <Anson.Huang@...escale.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] irqchip: imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup
sources
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:50:15PM +0000, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> The following structure is currently used in both drivers. The members "gpc_base/
> wakeup_sources/enabled_irqs" are now shared to PM driver. And the macro IMR_NUM
> will be referred by both drivers too.
>
> struct imx_gpcv2_irq {
> spinlock_t lock;
> void __iomem *gpc_base;
So this is the virtual base used by both irqchip and pm driver, and the
lock is for register access protection, right? If so, we can define gpc
as a syscon device, and access it from both drivers with regmap.
> u32 wakeup_sources[IMR_NUM];
This should be an irqchip internal data and exported to external users like
pm code with an interface like imx_gpcv2_get_wakeup_sources().
> u32 enabled_irqs[IMR_NUM];
I do not see how this is used in pm driver.
> u32 cpu2wakeup;
The only use of this in pm driver is to unmask interrupt #32 during
initialization. Why cannot it be done in irqchip driver initialization?
Shawn
> };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists