[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150728093449.GE2492@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:34:49 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] i2c: i801: Create iTCO device on newer Intel PCHs
On Mon, 27 Jul, at 07:08:08AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >@@ -113,6 +114,16 @@
> > #define SMBPCICTL 0x004
> > #define SMBPCISTS 0x006
> > #define SMBHSTCFG 0x040
> >+#define TCOBASE 0x050
> >+#define TCOCTL 0x054
> >+
> >+#define ACPIBASE 0x040
> >+#define ACPIBASE_SMI_OFF 0x030
> >+#define ACPICTRL 0x044
> >+#define ACPICTRL_EN BIT(7)
>
> If you use BIT, you should include bitops.h.
> Not sure if that makes too much sense here, though, without converting
> the rest of the driver to use BIT as well.
OK, I'll just switch to the existing notation used throughout the
driver rather than using bitops.
> >+static void i801_del_tco(struct i801_priv *priv)
> >+{
> >+ if (priv->tco_pdev) {
>
> platform_device_unregister() handles NULL pointers, so this if statement
> is strictly speaking unnecessary.
Good point, I'll remove this check since it makes the code simpler too.
> >+ platform_device_unregister(priv->tco_pdev);
> >+ priv->tco_pdev = NULL;
>
> Unnecessary; priv is going to be freed right afterwards.
I'll drop this.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists