[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <648d4acc7d082635e26d1b3dc65218a760612ec5.1438076484.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:42:29 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 015/124] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer
From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.
The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index a5457d577b98..6ad2e2d320fe 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void)
if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
struct sched_param param = {
- .sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+ .sched_priority = producer_fifo
};
sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m);
} else
--
2.4.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists