[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1438085921.2773.1.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 22:18:41 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@...abs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, strosake@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bogdan.purcareata@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] selftests/seccomp: Add powerpc support
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 11:59 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> > Wire up the syscall number and regs so the tests work on powerpc.
>
> This patch begs the question: this passes everything?
Doh, yes that would have been worth mentioning! :)
I'll update it before I commit it.
Yes everything passes, thanks very much for the tests BTW.
And for the record I've tested on: ppc64, ppc64 (compat), ppc64le,
ppc, ppc64e and ppc64e (compat).
> (I was reminded about syscall_restart while reading the patches. If
> everything passes, it looks like powerpc exposes syscall_restart? Seems like
> ARM remains the odd-arch-out on this. :P)
Yeah I noticed that and though "oh jeez not syscall_restart", but it seems to
pass, so I guess we behave in a standard fasion for once. I'll have a closer
look just to be sure before I merge.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists