[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1438089593-7696-20-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:19:50 +0200
From: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 19/22] phy: core: Probe phy providers on demand
When looking up a phy provider through its firmware node, probe it if it
hasn't already.
The goal is to reduce deferred probes to a minimum, as it makes it very
cumbersome to find out why a device failed to probe, and can introduce
very big delays in when a critical device is probed.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
---
Changes in v2: None
drivers/phy/phy-core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
index fc48fac003a6..c27e7d3d86ee 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
@@ -363,6 +363,8 @@ static struct phy *_of_phy_get(struct device_node *np, int index)
if (ret)
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+ fwnode_ensure_device(&args.np->fwnode);
+
mutex_lock(&phy_provider_mutex);
phy_provider = of_phy_provider_lookup(args.np);
if (IS_ERR(phy_provider) || !try_module_get(phy_provider->owner)) {
--
2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists