linux-kernel - Re: [Update][PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: Separate CPU device registration from CPU online

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150728022056.GN18535@linux>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:50:56 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Update][PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: Separate CPU device registration
 from CPU online

On 27-07-15, 23:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> +static void cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)

As I said in the earlier message, I need the return value of this to
be used for add_dev() callback. Which is required to retry probing the
device if it wasn't ready on a earlier call, i.e. it returns
-EPROBE_DEFER. My other patch already fixes the subsys layer for this.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/