lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJGhFXDKuayuKc2E58X5A7ZGN=uYCVDLnXw_t3_auBg+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:39:46 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/22] of/platform: add of_platform_device_find()

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Tomeu Vizoso
<tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com> wrote:
> From an arbitrary node in the tree, find the enclosing node that
> corresponds to a platform device, as registered by
> of_platform_populate().
>
> This can be used to find out what device needs to be probed so the
> dependency described by a given node is made available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Move the logic for finding a platform device from its firmware node to
>   of/platform.c as it's not needed for ACPI nodes.
>
>  drivers/of/platform.c       | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/of_platform.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index ff27494cda8c..89c5cd513027 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -501,6 +501,66 @@ void of_platform_depopulate(struct device *parent)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_platform_depopulate);
>
> +static bool of_is_platform(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +       int count;
> +
> +       count = of_property_count_strings(np, "compatible");
> +
> +       /* The node has to have a compatible string */
> +       if (!count)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       /* But it cannot be just a simple memory-mapped bus */
> +       if (count == 1 && of_match_node(of_default_bus_match_table, np))
> +               return false;
> +
> +       /* But AMBA devices aren't platform devices */
> +       if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "arm,primecell"))
> +               return false;
> +
> +       /* Node is immediately below root */
> +       if (!np->parent || !np->parent->parent)
> +               return true;
> +
> +       /* If it's a node in a simple memory-mapped bus */
> +       if (of_match_node(of_default_bus_match_table, np->parent))
> +               return true;

This seems really fragile. What about platform devices which are
children of MFDs but are not "simple-mfd"?

Does of_find_device_by_node not work for you? That is probably not the
most efficient search, but we could fix that. We could add struct
device ptr to struct device_node and check without searching for
example.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ