linux-kernel - Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55B790BA.5000509@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:24:58 +0200
From:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	public_timo.s@...entcreek.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, wens@...e.org
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and
 board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi

Hi,

On 07/28/2015 02:49 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:43:20PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 27-07-15 14:09, public_timo.s@...entcreek.de wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Hans de Goede schrieb am 27.07.2015 10:07:
>>>
>>>> I've a simular patch here:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commit/6a30b7d5be6012b81e5e1439a444e41c0ac1afc1
>>>>
>>>> I did not submit this upstream yet as it is part of a series to enable the otg
>>>> controller on the bananapi which needs axp-usb-power-supply support for which
>>>> the actual powersupply driver changes are still pending.
>>>
>>> Oops, I see. Are you planning to submit this for 4.3 or later?
>>
>> I plan to submit this for 4.3.
>
> I don't feel like holding patches that were posted before you did
> because you did them some time ago and never submitted them is
> reasonnable and / or encouraging for new submitters of patches.
>
> I'd really like to get more sunxi-people contributing, and that starts
> with that kind of trivial stuff. Holding them back because one of the
> usual (and experienced) developpers is a bit counter-productive (and
> I'm sure you still have a lot of patches to submit anyway ;)).

I've no problem with Timo submitting a cleaned up version of his
patch and you taking that instead. I just wanted to point out that
I do have a similar patch pending.

Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/