[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150728143752.GG28175@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:37:52 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, jolsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, tools, stat: Fix perf stat -T
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:32:57AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:30:18PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:21:32AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:10:06PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:24:51PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> > > > > + update_stats(&runtime_cycles_in_tx_stats[ctx][cpu], count[0]);
>
> > > > oops, looks like copy&paste issue.. thanks
>
> > > > we now print comment line if the avg is 0, but I think it's ok
>
> > > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
>
> > > This affects just perf/core, right?
>
> > I guess, dont think it's an urgent one.. Andi, please speak up ;-)
>
> I'm not talking about it being urgent or not, I'm talking about it being
> a bug present only in perf/core or if this is something that is in
> perf/urgent, i.e. affects what is in Linus's upstream tree, etc.
ah ok, it affects perf/urgent as well
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists