[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150728143854.GH12927@tiger>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 22:38:54 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Shenwei Wang <Shenwei.Wang@...escale.com>
Cc: "shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Huang Anson <Anson.Huang@...escale.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] irqchip: imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup
sources
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:27:42PM +0000, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> > > +static int gpcv2_wakeup_source_save(void) {
> > > + struct imx_gpcv2_irq *cd;
> >
> > We generally name variables in an abbrev of the types to make them intuitive. I
> > tried hard to map "cd" to "imx_gpcv2_irq" and failed.
> > Can you help me on that?
>
> CD is the abbreviation of chip data which is a member of irq_data.
You are defining a variable of type imx_gpcv2_irq, neither chip_data nor
irq_data.
> > > +void ca7_cpu_resume(void);
> > > +void imx7_suspend(void __iomem *ocram_vbase);
> >
> > Why do these declarations need to be in this header?
>
> Just to resolve the compile errors.
Wrong solution. They belong to some header in arch/arm/mach-imx not
include/soc/imx, as there is no code outside arch/arm/mach-imx needs
these declaration.
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists