[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <a2b1b8f76cb6c1b7843b4f9712695984a1356103.1438093915.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:47:11 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>, x86@...nel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 20/21] x86/asm/efi: Fix frame pointer usage in efi_call()
efi_call() is a callable non-leaf function which doesn't honor
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, which can result in bad stack traces.
Create a stack frame for it when CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_stub_64.S | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_stub_64.S b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_stub_64.S
index 86d0f9e..fd68dea 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_stub_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_stub_64.S
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <asm/msr.h>
#include <asm/processor-flags.h>
#include <asm/page_types.h>
+#include <asm/frame.h>
#define SAVE_XMM \
mov %rsp, %rax; \
@@ -74,6 +75,7 @@
.endm
ENTRY(efi_call)
+ FRAME
SAVE_XMM
mov (%rsp), %rax
mov 8(%rax), %rax
@@ -88,6 +90,7 @@ ENTRY(efi_call)
RESTORE_PGT
addq $48, %rsp
RESTORE_XMM
+ ENDFRAME
ret
ENDPROC(efi_call)
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists