[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150728154819.GE2660@techsingularity.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:48:20 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Pintu Kumar <pintu.k@...sung.com>,
Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>, Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary updating of GFP
flags during normal operation
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:36:05PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> >+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> >@@ -124,7 +124,9 @@ unsigned long totalcma_pages __read_mostly;
> > unsigned long dirty_balance_reserve __read_mostly;
> >
> > int percpu_pagelist_fraction;
> >-gfp_t gfp_allowed_mask __read_mostly = GFP_BOOT_MASK;
> >+
> >+gfp_t __gfp_allowed_mask __read_mostly = GFP_BOOT_MASK;
> >+struct static_key gfp_restricted_key __read_mostly = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE;
>
> ... and here it's combined with STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE. I've suspected
> that this is not allowed, which Peter confirmed on IRC.
>
Thanks because I was not aware of hazards of that nature. I'll drop the
jump-label related patches from the series until the patches related to
the correct idiom are finalised. The micro-optimisations are not the
main point of this series and the savings are tiny.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists