lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHrpEqSGF-4=e4CxcMnFhcV8kR0kQ12xTCedGR03jQ3PTOunUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:39:21 -0500
From:	Zhi Li <lznuaa@...il.com>
To:	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Shenwei Wang <Shenwei.Wang@...escale.com>,
	"jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Huang Anson <Anson.Huang@...escale.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] ARM: imx: Add suspend codes for imx7D

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:16:20PM +0000, Shenwei Wang wrote:
>> > The files are named with "-imx7".  It's a clear sign that the build of the files
>> > should be controlled by something like related to "imx7".
>> > Ideally, it should be CONFIG_SOC_IMX7.  Since imx7d is the only supported imx7
>> > soc and there is no CONFIG_SOC_IMX7 available so far, it falls on
>> > CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D.
>>
>> We can also interpret "-imx7" is the first SoC which has the GPCv2 block.
>
> In that case you should name the block gpc-imx7d rather than gpcv2 and
> symbol as GPC_IMX7D rather than IMX_GPCV2.

So far, only IMX7D use this GPC.
i.MX8 will use system controller to control power.

best regards
Frank Li

>
>> > > > > +extern struct imx_gpcv2_irq *gpcv2_irq_instance;
>> > > >
>> > > > Will this give a checkpatch warning?
>> > >
>> > > Yes. Any suggestion for that? Move it to a header file?
>> >
>> > Get rid of it.
>>
>> Then you may resolve the following compile error:
>
> You didn't get my point.  Rather than defining it as a global variable,
> we should try to keep imx_gpcv2_irq as an internal data structure to
> irqchip driver, and use well-defined interface to access the data from
> pm driver when necessary.
>
> Shawn
>
>>
>> CC      arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx7.o
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx7.c: In function ‘imx_gpcv2_pm_init’:
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx7.c:836:7: error: ‘gpcv2_irq_instance’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>>   cd = gpcv2_irq_instance;
>>        ^
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx7.c:836:7: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-imx/pm-imx7.o] Error 1
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ