[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55B7B791.2050208@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:10:41 -0400
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
CC: "security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test,
and config option
On 07/28/2015 01:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Cooper
> <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com> wrote:
>> I suspect that the set_ldt(NULL, 0) call hasn't reached Xen before
>> xen_free_ldt() is attempting to nab back the pages which Xen still has
>> mapped as an LDT.
>>
> I just instrumented it with yet more LSL instructions. I'm pretty
> sure that set_ldt really is clearing at least LDT entry zero.
> Nonetheless the free_ldt call still oopses.
>
Yes, I added some instrumentation to the hypervisor and we definitely
set LDT to NULL before failing.
-boris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists